White Christian Nationalism

A Threat to American Democratic Principles

A Threat to American Democratic Principles

Introduction

White Christian Nationalism is an ideology that has gained significant traction in contemporary American politics. It is characterized by the belief that the United States was founded as an explicitly Christian nation and should be governed according to a specific interpretation of Christianity, often emphasizing the preservation of traditional social hierarchies and white cultural dominance (Whitehead & Perry, 2020). This paper argues that White Christian Nationalism stands in stark contrast to the fundamental principles of American democracy, undermining the values of equality, religious freedom, and pluralism.

Historical Context and Evolution

The roots of Christian nationalist concepts in America can be traced back to Puritan influences and the idea of a “City upon a Hill” (Gorski, 2017). The First Great Awakening in the 18th century further linked nationalism with religious fervor (Kidd, 2007). However, it was in the post-Civil War era that White Christian Nationalism began to take a more explicit form, with the rise of the Ku Klux Klan and its blend of white supremacy and Protestant Christianity (Baker, 2011). The Civil Rights era saw the emergence of the Religious Right, which sought to defend traditional social norms against perceived threats (Balmer, 2014). In recent years, White Christian Nationalist rhetoric has become increasingly prominent in political discourse, fueled by demographic changes and a sense of lost cultural hegemony among some white Christians (Jones, 2016). The evolution of this ideology reflects a long-standing fusion of religious fervor with nationalistic and racial sentiments, shaping the political and social landscape of the country.

Contradictions with Democratic Principles

White Christian Nationalism contradicts several core principles of American democracy:

a. Equality and Inclusion

The emphasis on social hierarchies and white cultural dominance within White Christian Nationalism directly conflicts with the democratic ideal of equality for all citizens regardless of race, ethnicity, or religion (Gorski & Türkmen-Dervişoğlu, 2013). It undermines the principle of “all men are created equal” enshrined in the Declaration of Independence.

b. Religious Freedom

By advocating for governance according to a specific interpretation of Christianity, White Christian Nationalism contradicts the principle of separation of church and state established in the First Amendment (Davis, 2018). It threatens religious pluralism and the free exercise of diverse faiths.

c. Pluralism and Diversity

White Christian Nationalism’s emphasis on preserving traditional social structures and resisting cultural change clashes with the democratic celebration of diversity and multiculturalism (Braunstein & Taylor, 2017). It rejects the idea of America as a “melting pot” of different cultures and identities.

Impact on American Politics and Society

White Christian Nationalism has significant impacts on American politics and society:

a. Political Discourse

It shapes political rhetoric, often demonizing non-Christians and minority groups, contributing to polarization, and hindering constructive dialogue (Whitehead et al., 2018). It also contributes to the spread of misinformation and conspiracy theories. The ideology has been linked to various political movements and figures, reinforcing a narrative that intertwines national identity with specific religious beliefs (Fea, 2018; Stewart, 2020).

b. Policy Implications 

White Christian Nationalism influences policies on issues such as abortion, LGBTQ+ rights, and immigration, often seeking to impose religious views on public policy (Kreitzer et al., 2014). This undermines the democratic process and threatens the rights and freedoms of individuals who do not conform to its worldview. The alignment of White Christian Nationalism with policy positions is particularly evident in debates surrounding immigration, where religious and nationalistic sentiments often converge (Jones, 2020).

c. Social Cohesion

The ideology fuels discrimination and prejudice against minority communities, weakening social cohesion and creating divisions along religious and racial lines (Edgell et al., 2016). It hinders efforts towards racial reconciliation and social justice.

Challenges to Democratic Values

White Christian Nationalism poses significant challenges to democratic values. It threatens pluralism and inclusivity by marginalizing minority groups and promoting a narrow vision of American identity (Straughn & Feld, 2010). It undermines the principles of equality, liberty, and justice for all by prioritizing the interests of a specific religious and racial group. Furthermore, it undermines the rule of law and the democratic process by seeking to impose religious doctrine on public policy (Jelen, 2005). The rise of White Christian Nationalism has also posed challenges to the media landscape, with certain outlets and social media platforms amplifying its messages, shaping public perception and understanding of key democratic concepts (Whitehead & Perry, 2020).

Counterarguments and Criticisms

Defenders of White Christian Nationalism often invoke claims of religious liberty, arguing that they are merely seeking to protect their right to practice their faith freely. However, critics point out that this defense fails to recognize how White Christian Nationalism infringes upon the religious liberties of others (Bivins, 2008). Moreover, the movement faces criticisms from religious and secular perspectives, with many arguing that it distorts Christian teachings and values (Goldberg, 2006). Significant internal debates and divisions within the movement also reflect the diversity of views and priorities among its adherents (Gorski, 2017).

The Way Forward

Countering the influence of White Christian Nationalism in American politics and society will require a multifaceted approach. Promoting interfaith dialogue and understanding is crucial for breaking down barriers and fostering mutual respect among religious communities (Patel, 2016). Education is vital in promoting democratic values and critical thinking skills, equipping individuals to resist extremist ideologies (Gross & Latham, 2012). Additionally, policymakers must work to implement inclusive policies that protect the rights of all Americans, regardless of their religious beliefs or cultural backgrounds.

Conclusion

White Christian Nationalism represents a significant threat to American democratic principles. Its emphasis on social hierarchies, religious exclusivism, and white cultural dominance contradicts the core values of equality, pluralism, and religious freedom. By examining this ideology’s historical roots and contemporary manifestations, we can better understand its impact on American politics and society. Ultimately, defending and strengthening American democracy will require a sustained commitment to upholding democratic values in the face of White Christian Nationalist ideology. It is up to all Americans to work towards a more inclusive, just, and equitable society that embodies the promise of liberty and justice for all.

References

Baker, K. J. (2011). Gospel according to the Klan: The KKK’s appeal to Protestant America, 1915-1930. University Press of Kansas.

Balmer, R. (2014). The real origins of the religious right. Politico Magazine. https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/05/religious-right-real-origins-107133/

Bivins, J. (2008). Religion of fear: The politics of horror in conservative evangelicalism. Oxford University Press.

Braunstein, R., & Taylor, M. (2017). Is the Tea Party a “religious” movement? Religiosity in the Tea Party versus the Religious Right. Sociology of Religion, 78(1), 33-59.

Davis, D. (2018). White Christian nationalism and the future of evangelical politics. Religion & Politics. https://religionandpolitics.org/2018/10/16/white-christian-nationalism-and-the-future-of-evangelical-politics/

Edgell, P., Gerteis, J., & Hartmann, D. (2016). Atheists and other cultural outsiders: Moral boundaries and the non-religious in the United States. Social Forces, 95(2), 607-638.

Fea, J. (2018). Believe me: The Evangelical road to Donald Trump. Eerdmans Publishing. https://www.eerdmans.com/Products/7763/believe-me.aspx

Goldberg, M. (2006). Kingdom coming: The rise of Christian nationalism. W. W. Norton & Company.

Gorski, P. (2017). Why evangelicals voted for Trump: A critical cultural sociology. American Journal of Cultural Sociology, 5(3), 338-354.

Gorski, P., & Türkmen-Dervişoğlu, G. (2013). Religion, nationalism, and violence: An integrated approach. Annual Review of Sociology, 39, 193-210.

Gross, M., & Latham, D. (2012). Digital citizenship in twenty-first-century young adult literature: Imaginary activism. Palgrave Macmillan.

Jelen, T. G. (2005). Political Esperanto: Rhetorical resources and limitations of the Christian right in the United States. Sociology of Religion, 66(3), 303-321.

Jones, R. P. (2016). The end of white Christian America. Simon & Schuster.

Jones, R. P. (2020). White too long: The legacy of white supremacy in American Christianity. Simon & Schuster. https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/White-Too-Long/Robert-P-Jones/9781982122867

Kidd, T. S. (2007). The Great Awakening: The roots of evangelical Christianity in colonial America. Yale University Press.

Kreitzer, R. J., Hamilton, A. J., & Tolbert, C. J. (2014). Does policy adoption change opinions on minority rights? The effects of legalizing same-sex marriage. Political Research Quarterly, 67(4), 795-808.

Patel, E. (2016). Interfaith leadership: A primer. Beacon Press.

Stewart, K. (2020). The power worshippers: Inside the dangerous rise of religious nationalism. Bloomsbury Publishing. https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/power-worshippers-9781635573435/

Straughn, J. B., & Feld, S. L. (2010). America as a “Christian nation”? Understanding religious boundaries of national identity in the United States. Sociology of Religion, 71(3), 280-306.

Whitehead, A. L., & Perry, S. L. (2020). Taking America back for God: Christian nationalism in the United States. Oxford University Press. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/taking-america-back-for-god-9780190057886

Whitehead, A. L., Perry, S. L., & Baker, J. O. (2018). Make America Christian again: Christian nationalism and voting for Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential election. Sociology of Religion, 79(2), 147-171.